Calculating r using an iterative method (cont.)
A worked example using empirical fertility and mortality schedules (cont.)
We can then use iterative methods to get a more precise estimate of the growth rate. It is clear that a slightly lower value of r is needed to balance the equation, and it would be possible to keep guessing values of the growth rate to move towards a sum of 1.0. But Coale’s iteration formula for a subsequent value of r allows us to refine our estimate of the growth rate more efficiently. In this formula, r1 is the previous estimate of r and x1 the previous sum of Lotka’s equation. The NRR in this population is 2.319.
So in this case, our next growth rate estimate will be:
Once again we insert the new value of the growth rate in to Lotka’s equation to see if we have found the correct growth rate for the given schedules of fx and Lx. If the equation still does not converge to 1, we repeat the process until it does:
Age group | Mid-point | Female age-specific fertility rate | Life table person years | Iterations | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5fx.5Lx.exp{-ra} | |||||||
x - x+4 | a | 5fx/2.05 | 5Lx | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
15-19 | 17.5 | 0.03234 | 4.76625 | 0.08937 | 0.09312 | 0.09334 | 0.09334 |
20-24 | 22.5 | 0.10356 | 4.74050 | 0.24360 | 0.25679 | 0.25758 | 0.25760 |
25-29 | 27.5 | 0.12429 | 4.70725 | 0.24844 | 0.26499 | 0.26599 | 0.26601 |
30-34 | 32.5 | 0.10400 | 4.66750 | 0.17640 | 0.19037 | 0.19122 | 0.19124 |
35-39 | 37.5 | 0.07741 | 4.61900 | 0.11120 | 0.12142 | 0.12204 | 0.12206 |
40-44 | 42.5 | 0.03795 | 4.55550 | 0.04601 | 0.05083 | 0.05113 | 0.05114 |
45-49 | 47.5 | 0.01624 | 4.46675 | 0.01652 | 0.01847 | 0.01859 | 0.01859 |
NRR = | 2.319 | Lotka sum | 0.93155 | 0.99598 | 0.99989 | 1.00000 | |
G ≈ | 27 | r estimate | 0.0311 | 0.0288 | 0.0287 | 0.0287 |
After 4 iterations, we can see that Lotka’s equation has produced a value of 1. This means we have found the correct growth rate for the given schedules of fx and Lx.